740 A.2d 690 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1999), State v. Abeskaron

Citation: 740 A.2d 690, 326 N.J.Super. 110

Opinion Judge: [8] The opinion of the court was delivered by: Per Curiam

Party Name: STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Emad A. ABESKARON, Lance D. Bates, Martin A. Lebson, and Jay Palmer, Defendants-Appellants. In the Matter of The Admissibility Hearing of the LTI Marksman 20-20 Laser Speed Detection System.

Attorney: [6] Sohail Mohammed, attorney for appellants.

Case Date: November 24, 1999

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

740 A.2d 690 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1999), State v. Abeskaron

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 511 S.E.2d 625 (Ga.App. 1999), A98A2475, Izer v. State
Maryland - 664 A.2d 375 (Md. 1995), 94, Goldstein v. State
New Jersey - 137 A. 151 (N.J.Super.Ch. 1927), In re Request To Judges In Chancery for Advisory Opinions
New Jersey - 115 A.2d 35 (N.J. 1955), A-158, State v. Dantonio
New Jersey - 319 A.2d 733 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1974), State v. Finkle

See all quotations