724 P.2d 338 (Or.App. 1986), CA A37224, Hertel v. Employment Div.

Citation: 724 P.2d 338, 80 Or.App. 784

Opinion Judge: VAN HOOMISSEN, J.

Party Name: Joseph A. HERTEL, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION and Viking Industries, Respondents.

Attorney: Kathryn S. Augustson, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief was Reynolds & Johnston, Portland. Thomas W. Sondag, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Viking Industries. With him on the brief were Richard C. Hunt, Portland, and Spears, Lubersky, Campbell, Bledsoe, A...

Case Date: August 20, 1986

Court: Oregon Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

724 P.2d 338 (Or.App. 1986), CA A37224, Hertel v. Employment Div.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Oregon Caselaw - 365 P.2d 498 (Or. 1961), Henzel v. Cameron
Oregon Caselaw - 616 P.2d 524 (Or.App. 1980), CA 16945, Sothras v. Employment Division
Oregon Caselaw - 639 P.2d 690 (Or.App. 1982), CA 19354, Blivens v. Employment Division
Oregon Caselaw - 653 P.2d 574 (Or.App. 1982), CA A23643, Cascade Forest Products, Inc. v. Accident Prevention Div.
Oregon Caselaw - 714 P.2d 1087 (Or.App. 1986), CA A35860, Guerra v. Real Estate Div.