72 S.E.2d 572 (S.C. 1952), 16671, Raley v. City of Camden

Citation: 72 S.E.2d 572, 222 S.C. 303

Opinion Judge: FISHBURNE, Justice.

Party Name: RALEY v. CITY OF CAMDEN.

Attorney: Messrs. Savage & Marion and Harold W. Funderburk, of Camden, for Appellant-Respondent, cite: As to the claimant not suffering an accident within the meaning of the Workmen's Compensation Law: 183 S.C. 199, 217, 190 S.E. 451, 458; 203 S.C. 96, 26 S.E.2d 313; 197 S.C. 313, 15 S.E.2d 334; 209 S.C. 4...

Case Date: September 24, 1952

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

72 S.E.2d 572 (S.C. 1952), 16671, Raley v. City of Camden

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 218 U.S. 406 (1910), 15, Western Union Telegraph Company
South Carolina - 15 S.E.2d 334 (S.C. 1941), 15277, Green v. City of Bennettsville
South Carolina - 18 S.E.2d 668 (S.C. 1942), 15370, Westbury v. Heslep & Thomason Co.
South Carolina - 22 S.E.2d 881 (S.C. 1942), 15468, Buggs v. United States Rubber Co., Winnsboro Mills
South Carolina - 24 S.E.2d 109 (S.C. 1943), 15489, Smith v. Southern Builders

See all quotations