72 N.W. 885 (Wis. 1897), Gilman v. Gross

Citation: 72 N.W. 885, 97 Wis. 224

Opinion Judge: NEWMAN, J.

Party Name: GILMAN, Assignee, Respondent, v. GROSS, Appellant

Attorney: For the appellant there was a brief by Winkler, Flanders, Smith, Bottum & Vilas, and oral argument by F. C. Winkler. For the respondent, Nathaniel S. Robinson argued, among other things, that parol evidence was inadmissible to show a condition as to the delivery of the subscription.

Judge Panel: ALFRED W. NEWMAN, J.

Case Date: October 22, 1897

Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court