718 P.2d 1363 (Or. 1986), SC S31433, In re Conduct of Potts

Citation: 718 P.2d 1363, 301 Or. 57

Opinion Judge: PER CURIAM

Party Name: In re Complaint as to the CONDUCT OF Clarence A. POTTS, M. Lyle Trammell and Terry G. Hannon.

Attorney: Mark McCulloch, of Powers, McCulloch & Bennett, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for accused Clarence A. Potts. Jack L. Kennedy, of Kennedy, King & Zimmer, Portland, argued the cause for accused M. Lyle Trammell. With him on the brief and reply brief was Susan E. Watts, Portland. Jo...

Case Date: April 29, 1986

Court: Oregon Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

718 P.2d 1363 (Or. 1986), SC S31433, In re Conduct of Potts

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 557 F.2d 1015 (3rd Cir. 1977), 76-2190, Prandini v. National Tea Co.
Federal Cases - 585 F.2d 47 (3rd Cir. 1978), 77-2261, Prandini v. National Tea Co.
Florida - 376 So.2d 858 (Fla. 1979), 57322, The Florida Bar v. Shannon
Oregon Caselaw - 274 P.2d 797 (Or. 1954), In re Richards
Oregon Caselaw - 659 P.2d 960 (Or. 1983), SC 28672, In re Conduct of Thomas

See all quotations