716 P.2d 724 (Or. 1986), SC S31480, Ross v. Springfield School Dist. No. 19

Citation: 716 P.2d 724, 300 Or. 507

Opinion Judge: CAMPBELL, J.

Party Name: Frank W. ROSS, Petitioner on Review, v. SPRINGFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 19, Respondent on Review.

Attorney: Robert D. Durham, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the petition was Kulongoski, Durham, Drummonds & Columbo, Portland. John C. Volmert, Springfield, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the response was Wurtz, Logan & Logan, Springfield. James M. ...

Case Date: February 11, 1986

Court: Oregon Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

716 P.2d 724 (Or. 1986), SC S31480, Ross v. Springfield School Dist. No. 19

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Oregon Caselaw - 591 P.2d 1381 (Or. 1979), SC 25719, McPherson v. Employment Division
Oregon Caselaw - 605 P.2d 273 (Or. 1980), SC 26120, Megdal v. Oregon State Bd. of Dental Examiners
Oregon Caselaw - 621 P.2d 547 (Or. 1980), SC 26542, Springfield Educ. Ass'n v. Springfield School Dist. No. 19
Oregon Caselaw - 639 P.2d 90 (Or. 1981), SC 27638, City of Roseburg v. Roseburg City Firefighters, Local No. 1489
Oregon Caselaw - 657 P.2d 188 (Or. 1982), SC 28590, Ross v. Springfield School Dist. No. 19

See all quotations