71 S.E.2d 407 (S.C. 1952), 16635, Hopkins v. Derst Baking Co.

Citation: 71 S.E.2d 407, 221 S.C. 497

Opinion Judge: TAYLOR, Justice.

Party Name: HOPKINS v. DERST BAKING CO. et al.

Attorney: Messrs. Moore & Mouzon, of Charleston, for Appellants, cite: As to the verdict being so grossly excessive as to require the granting of a new trial: 215 S.C. 404, 55 S.E.2d 522. As to when only one reasonable inference, not just one inference, but one reasonable inference can be deduced from the ...

Case Date: Friday June 06, 1952

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

71 S.E.2d 407 (S.C. 1952), 16635, Hopkins v. Derst Baking Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 195 S.E. 247 (S.C. 1938), 14612, Montgomery v. National Convoy & Trucking Co.
South Carolina - 82 S.E. 275 (S.C. 1914), 8867, Sturdyvin v. Atlanta & C. A. L. R. Co.
South Carolina - 20 S.E.2d 153 (S.C. 1942), 15407, Eickhoff v. Beard-Laney, Inc.
South Carolina - 42 S.E.2d 705 (S.C. 1947), 15949, Bowers v. Charleston & W. C. Ry. Co.
South Carolina - 43 S.E.2d 355 (S.C. 1947), 15961, Jones v. American Fidelity & Cas. Co.

See all quotations