Opinion Judge:
[113 Mich. 188] MOORE, J. with that, if the deed should be received we propose to follow it up by adverse possession beyond the period. The Court: Now, let us see if we are agreed as to some things that already appear. I understand it is in evidence, and is not sought to be contradicted, that Mr. and Mrs. Nestell lived together as husband and wife
Party Name:
WARD v. NESTELL ET AL.
Attorney:
Spaulding & Norton and Fedewa & Walbridge, for appellants. Lyon & Dooling, for appellee.
Judge Panel:
Grant, J., dissenting. GRANT, J. (dissenting; after stating the facts).
