71 Cal.App.3d 909, 16124, Romo v. Southern Pac. Transportation Co.

Citation: 71 Cal.App.3d 909, 139 Cal.Rptr. 787

Opinion Judge: [10] Friedman

Party Name: Romo v. Southern Pac. Transportation Co.

Attorney: [7] Cresswell, Martin & Lamborn and Hurd, Meyer, Mitchell & Kaufman, Irving J. Hurd, Jr., Daniel L. Mitchell and Dennis M. Law for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Chalmers, Sans & Gardner, Diepenbrock, Wulff, Plant & Hannegan, James Diepenbrock and Dennis M. Campos for Defendant and Respondent.

Case Date: July 08, 1977

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

71 Cal.App.3d 909, 16124, Romo v. Southern Pac. Transportation Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 12 Cal.2d 691, 5230, Hinkle v. Southern Pacific Co.
California - 22 Cal.2d 111, 18534, Peri v. L. A. Junction Railway
California - 41 Cal.2d 180, 22315, Gray v. Brinkerhoff
California - 44 Cal.2d 107, 23340, Callahan v. Gray
California - 1 Cal.3d 253, 7847, Hogue v. Southern Pacific Co.

See all quotations