708 A.2d 969 (Conn.App. 1998), 14769, State v. Santiago

Citation: 708 A.2d 969, 48 Conn.App. 19

Opinion Judge: SPEAR, J.

Party Name: STATE of Connecticut v. Ruben SANTIAGO.

Attorney: Michael G. Considine, Stamford, with whom, on the brief, were Stanley A. Twardy, Jr., and Keith P. Carroll, for appellant (defendant)., Mitchell S. Brody, Senior Assistant State's Attorney, with whom, on the brief, were James E. Thomas, State's Attorney, and Rosita M. Creamer, Assistant State's A...

Judge Panel: Before LAVERY, LANDAU and SPEAR, JJ. In this opinion the other judges concurred.

Case Date: Tuesday March 10, 1998

Court: Connecticut Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

708 A.2d 969 (Conn.App. 1998), 14769, State v. Santiago

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 881 F.2d 1128 (D.C. Cir. 1989), 88-3096, U.S. v. Anderson
Federal Cases - 475 U.S. 673 (1986), 84-1279, Delaware v. Van Arsdall
Connecticut - 438 A.2d 418 (Conn. 1980), State v. Cooper
Connecticut - 505 A.2d 717 (Conn. 1986), State v. Roma
Connecticut - 562 A.2d 493 (Conn. 1989), 13195, State v. Oehman

See all quotations