707 A.2d 473 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1998), Fu v. Fu

Citation: 707 A.2d 473, 309 N.J.Super. 435

Opinion Judge: The opinion of the court was delivered by: Wefing, J.A.D.

Party Name: Li FU and Xiao Kang Su, wife and husband, Plaintiffs-Respondents,and Daniel Su, an infant by his parents and natural guardians, Li Fu and Xiao Kang Su, and Li Fu and Xiao Kang Su, individually and Kuide Chen and Michelle Chen, an infant by her father and natural guardian, Kuide Chen and Kuide Chen, individually, Plaintiffs, v. Hong FU, Defendant-Re

Attorney: John M. Palm argued the cause for appellant (Garrigle, Palm and Thomasson, attorneys; Mr. Palm, of counsel; Eleanore A. Rogalski, on the brief). Benjamin N. Cittadino argued the cause for respondents Li Fu and Xiao Kang Su (Devlin, Cittadino & Shaw, attorneys; John G. Devlin, on the brief). Rober...

Case Date: March 31, 1998

Court: New Jersey Superior Court