700 F.3d 534 (D.C. Cir. 2012), 11-1135, Cellco Partnership v. Federal Communications Commission

Citation: 700 F.3d 534

Opinion Judge: TATEL, Circuit Judge:

Party Name: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, Appellant v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Appellee Bright House Networks, LLC, et al., Intervenors.

Attorney: Helgi C. Walker argued the cause for appellant. With her on the briefs were Thomas R. McCarthy, Brett A. Shumate, Henry Weissmann, Michael E. Glover, and John T. Scott III. Andrew G. McBride entered an appearance. Peter Karanjia, Deputy General Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, argued t...

Judge Panel: Before: TATEL, GARLAND, and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.

Case Date: December 04, 2012

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

700 F.3d 534 (D.C. Cir. 2012), 11-1135, Cellco Partnership v. Federal Communications Commission

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

US Code - 47 U.S.C. § 151 Purposes of Chapter; Federal Communications Commission Created
US Code - 47 U.S.C. § 153 Definitions
US Code - 47 U.S.C. § 303 Powers and Duties of Commission
US Code - 47 U.S.C. § 316 Modification By Commission of Station Licenses Or Construction Permits; Burden of Proof
US Code - 47 U.S.C. § 402 Judicial Review of Commission's Orders and Decisions

See all quotations