70 S.E.2d 629 (S.C. 1952), 16625, Hicks v. McCandlish

Citation: 70 S.E.2d 629, 221 S.C. 410

Opinion Judge: FISHBURNE, Justice.

Party Name: HICKS v. McCANDLISH et al.

Attorney: Messrs. Thomas, Cain & Nettles, of Columbia, and Paulling & James, of Darlington, for Appellants, cite: As to there being no testimony in this case, nor any inference deductible therefrom, which would support a verdict for punitive damages: 195 S.C. 437, 12 S.E.2d 19; 15 Am. Jur. 713, Sec. 278; 7...

Case Date: Wednesday May 07, 1952

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

70 S.E.2d 629 (S.C. 1952), 16625, Hicks v. McCandlish

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 128 S.E. 423 (S.C. 1925), 11785, Bailey v. Smith
South Carolina - 184 S.E. 164 (S.C. 1936), 14242, Anderson v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
South Carolina - 185 S.E. 180 (S.C. 1936), 14273, Sanders v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
South Carolina - 191 S.E. 209 (S.C. 1937), 14470, Sample v. Gulf Refining Co.
South Carolina - 38 S.E. 240 (S.C. 1901), Watts v. South Bound R. Co.

See all quotations