70 S.E.2d 473 (S.C. 1952), 16620, Durant v. Stuckey

Citation: 70 S.E.2d 473, 221 S.C. 342

Opinion Judge: E. H. HENDERSON, Acting Associate Justice.

Party Name: DURANT v. STUCKEY.

Attorney: Mr. James Hugh McFaddin, of Manning, for Appellant, cites: As to error on part of trial judge in refusing to charge plaintiff's requests which stated a correct, applicable proposition of law: (S. C.) 66 S.E.2d 322; 218 S.C. 537, 63 S.E.2d 479; 58 S.C. 70, 36 S.E. 440, 53 L. R. A. 1913; 5 Am. Jur....

Case Date: Monday April 28, 1952

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

70 S.E.2d 473 (S.C. 1952), 16620, Durant v. Stuckey

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 31 S.E.2d 133 (S.C. 1944), 15669, Seay v. Southern Railway-Carolina Division
South Carolina - 48 S.E.2d 620 (S.C. 1948), 16101, Bishop v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
South Carolina - 63 S.E.2d 476 (S.C. 1951), 16467, Jones v. Atlanta-Charlotte Air Line Ry. Co.
South Carolina - 66 S.E.2d 322 (S.C. 1951), 16527, Dawson v. South Carolina Power Co.
South Carolina - 70 S.E.2d 553 (S.C. 1952), 16621, Windham v. City of Florence