70 A.2d 873 (N.J. 1950), No. A--47, Protomastro v. Board of Adjustment of The City of Hoboken

Citation: 70 A.2d 873, 3 N.J. 494

Opinion Judge: Case, J.

Party Name: GUSTAV PROTOMASTRO, MARIE TIMONEY, VERA PALMA, LOUISE CASILLI, AMADIO DePASQUALE, FORTUNE DePASQUALE, CIRO SELLITTI AND TERESA SELLITTI, JOSEPHINE POLICASTRO, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF HOBOKEN (ALSO KNOWN AS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF HOBOKEN), AND AVENEL INDUSTRIAL REALTY CORPORATION, DEFENDA

Attorney: Mr. Edward Stover argued the cause for appellants. Mr. Nicholas S. Schloeder argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Levenson & Levenson, attorneys for Avenel Industrial Realty Corporation; Mr. Dominick H. Rinaldi, attorney for Board of Adjustment of the City of Hoboken).

Judge Panel: For reversal -- Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Case, Heher, Oliphant and Ackerson. For affirmance -- Justices Wachenfeld and Burling.

Case Date: Monday January 09, 1950

Court: New Jersey Supreme Court

Linked as:


Document options

Extract

70 A.2d 873 (N.J. 1950), No. A--47, Protomastro v. Board of Adjustment of The City of Hoboken

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites