7 Cal.App.4th 1194, G011178, Neal v. Montgomery Elevator Co.

Citation: 7 Cal.App.4th 1194, 9 Cal.Rptr.2d 497

Opinion Judge: [10] Wallin

Party Name: Neal v. Montgomery Elevator Co.

Attorney: [7] Danner & Bishop and Harvey L. Goldhammer for Defendant and Appellant. [8] Oliver, Sloan, Moore, Vargas, McMillan, Jacobs & Pico, Janice Corsino and Tristan R. Pico for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Case Date: Tuesday June 30, 1992

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

7 Cal.App.4th 1194, G011178, Neal v. Montgomery Elevator Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 38 Cal.2d 633, 6232, Conner v. Southern Pacific Co.
California - 61 Cal.2d 738, 21675, Malkasian v. Irwin
California - 68 Cal.2d 104, 22549, Mercer v. Perez
California - 20 Cal.3d 413, 23519, Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.
California - 38 Cal.3d 892, 24709, Sanchez-Corea v. Bank of America

See all quotations