691 P.2d 114 (Or.App. 1984), CA A29816, Rogers v. Rogers

Citation: 691 P.2d 114, 71 Or.App. 133

Opinion Judge: YOUNG, J.

Party Name: In the Matter of the Estate of Wallace B. Rogers, Sr., Deceased. Leonard Blakeslee ROGERS and Wallace Blakeslee Rogers, Jr., Respondents-Cross-Appellants, v. Anita E. ROGERS and Alda E. Hartfiel, Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas C. Hartfiel, Appellants-Cross-Respondents.

Attorney: Eldon F. Caley, Roseburg, argued the cause for appellants - cross-respondents. With him on the briefs was Neal Walker, Roseburg. Randolph L. Garrison, Roseburg, argued the cause for respondents - cross-appellants. With him on the briefs was Garrison & Garrison, Roseburg.

Case Date: November 21, 1984

Court: Oregon Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

691 P.2d 114 (Or.App. 1984), CA A29816, Rogers v. Rogers

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Nebraska - 339 N.W.2d 914 (Neb. 1983), 81-867, In re Estate of Flicker
Oregon Caselaw - 142 P.2d 785 (Or. 1943), U.S. Nat. Bank of Portland v. First Nat. Bank of Portland
Oregon Caselaw - 143 P.2d 909 (Or. 1943), U.S. Nat. Bank of Portland v. First Nat. Bank of Portland
Oregon Caselaw - 277 P.2d 781 (Or. 1954), In re Lappy's Estate
Oregon Caselaw - 494 P.2d 258 (Or.App. 1972), In re Crohn's Estate

See all quotations