69 S.E.2d 896 (Ga.App. 1952), 33741, Abernathy v. Putnam

Citation: 69 S.E.2d 896, 85 Ga.App. 644

Party Name: ABERNATHY v. PUTNAM et al.

Attorney: None of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial is meritorious. The plaintiff in error contends that his petition is based upon an express contract and that he was, therefore, under the pleadings and the evidence entitled to the full amount of his contract price for which he sued. Such ...

Case Date: Friday March 14, 1952

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals