69 S.E.2d 583 (Ga.App. 1952), 33843, Lay v. State

Citation: 69 S.E.2d 583, 85 Ga.App. 315

Opinion Judge: GARDNER, Judge.

Party Name: LAY v. STATE.

Attorney: No error of law appearing and the evidence being ample to support the finding of the jury that the defendant participated in the operation of a lottery, known as the number game, the verdict finding the defendant guilty was authorized by the evidence and was not contrary to law., John Brock Lay w...

Judge Panel: MacINTYRE, P. J., and TOWNSEND, J., concur.

Case Date: Tuesday February 19, 1952

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

69 S.E.2d 583 (Ga.App. 1952), 33843, Lay v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 30 S.E.2d 824 (Ga.App. 1944), 30568, Mills v. State
Georgia - 4 S.E.2d 112 (Ga.App. 1939), 27416, Lunsford v. State
Georgia - 65 S.E.2d 184 (Ga.App. 1951), 33518, Lumpkin v. State
Georgia - 69 S.E.2d 617 (Ga.App. 1952), 33866, Sammons v. Copeland