688 A.2d 491 (Md.App. 1997), 668, Himelstein v. Arrow Cab

Citation: 688 A.2d 491, 113 Md.App. 530

Opinion Judge: [10] The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garrity

Party Name: Michelle HIMELSTEIN, v. ARROW CAB.

Attorney: [7] Argued BY Andrea C. Babest and Samuel Sperling (Leonard J. Sperling and Sperling & Framm on the brief) all of Baltimore, Md., For Appellant.

Case Date: February 03, 1997

Court: Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

688 A.2d 491 (Md.App. 1997), 668, Himelstein v. Arrow Cab

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Maryland - 371 A.2d 1094 (Md. 1977), 153, Dorf v. Skolnik
Maryland - 439 A.2d 1104 (Md. 1982), 87, Mass Transit Administration v. Household Finance Corp.
Maryland - 475 A.2d 1235 (Md.App. 1984), 1320, Rubin v. Weissman
Maryland - 578 A.2d 1202 (Md. 1990), 91, Heat & Power Corp. v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.
Maryland - 635 A.2d 14 (Md.App. 1994), 489, Van Wyk, Inc. v. Fruitrade Intern., Inc.

See all quotations