683 P.2d 234 (Wash.App. Div. 1 1984), 11757-2, State v. Vargas

Citation: 683 P.2d 234, 37 Wn.App. 780

Opinion Judge: DURHAM, Chief Judge. Before Although Vargas does not assign error to it, the reference to theft by taking in instruction 8 was erroneous the jury can be instructed on and allowed to consider the various ways of committing a crime, there must be sufficient evidence to support the instructions State v Golladay, 78 Wash2d 121, 137, 470 P.2d 191 1970 B

Party Name: STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Andrew VARGAS, Appellant.

Attorney: E. Paul Giersch, Seattle (Court-appointed), for appellant. , Norman K. Maleng, King County Pros. Atty., Kurt P. Hermanns, Deputy Pros. Atty., Seattle, for respondent., DURHAM, Chief Judge., Andrew Vargas appeals his conviction of first degree theft. During the summer of 1981, Vargas was the manag...

Judge Panel: SCHOLFIELD and ANDERSEN, JJ., concur.

Case Date: June 11, 1984

Court: Washington Court of Appeals