68 S.E.2d 242 (Ga.App. 1951), 33816, Alexander v. Holmes

Citation: 68 S.E.2d 242, 85 Ga.App. 124

Party Name: ALEXANDER et al. v. HOLMES.

Attorney: (b) General damages are those which the law presumes to flow from the tortious act and were sufficiently alleged here to withstand general demurrer. Also, the special grounds of the amended motion for a new trial raising this question are without merit., John Ernest Holmes, the defendant in error...

Case Date: December 05, 1951

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

68 S.E.2d 242 (Ga.App. 1951), 33816, Alexander v. Holmes

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 163 S.E. 250 (Ga.App. 1932), 21563, Personal Finance Co. v. Evans
Georgia - 164 S.E. 806 (Ga. 1932), 8986, Gaines v. Brown
Georgia - 165 S.E. 626 (Ga. 1932), 8737, Wooten v. Morris
Georgia - 167 S.E. 325 (Ga.App. 1933), 22162, City of Rome v. Stone
Georgia - 53 S.E. 672 (Ga. 1906), Henley v. Brockman