68 S.E.2d 233 (Ga.App. 1951), 33743, Waters v. State

Citation: 68 S.E.2d 233, 85 Ga.App. 79

Party Name: WATERS v. STATE.

Attorney: It appearing here that the motion of plaintiff in error for a continuance on account of the absence of a witness sufficiently complied with the requirements provided by law, and that the evidence sought to be procured was material to the defense, the trial court abused his discretion in denying t...

Case Date: December 04, 1951

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

68 S.E.2d 233 (Ga.App. 1951), 33743, Waters v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 52 Ga. 353 (Ga. 1874), Peacock v. Usry
Georgia - 120 S.E. 37 (Ga.App. 1923), 14807, Fuss v. State
Georgia - 68 S.E. 515 (Ga.App. 1910), 2,695, Hobbs v. State
Georgia - 71 S.E. 9 (Ga.App. 1911), 2,927-2,931, Miller v. Caraker
Georgia - 68 S.E.2d 172 (Ga.App. 1951), 33799, Holmes Mfg. Co. v. Fraker