676 A.2d 1237 (Pa.Super. 1996), DiLucido v. Terminix Intern., Inc.

Citation: 676 A.2d 1237, 450 Pa.Super. 393

Opinion Judge: The opinion of the court was delivered by: Montemuro

Party Name: Patricia DiLUCIDO, Mitchell Rosen and Dena Rosen, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Appellants, v. TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL, INC., and the Terminix International Company L.P., Appellees.

Attorney: Jay S. Cohen, Lower Gwynedd, for appellants.

Case Date: Wednesday May 22, 1996

Court: Pennsylvania Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

676 A.2d 1237 (Pa.Super. 1996), DiLucido v. Terminix Intern., Inc.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 429 U.S. 828 (1976), 75-1765, Riebschlaeger v. United States
Pennsylvania - 321 A.2d 664 (Pa.Cmwlth. 1974), Com. by Packel v. Tolleson
Pennsylvania - 329 A.2d 812 (Pa. 1974), Com., by Creamer v. Monumental Properties, Inc.
Pennsylvania - 340 A.2d 428 (Pa. 1975), Com. by Packel v. Tolleson
Pennsylvania - 348 A.2d 734 (Pa. 1975), Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.

See all quotations