674 A.2d 1027 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1996), Intervine Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Gloucester City Zoning Bd. of Adjustment

Citation: 674 A.2d 1027, 290 N.J.Super. 78

Opinion Judge: [12] The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kimmelman

Party Name: INTERVINE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF GLOUCESTER CITY ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT and City of Gloucester City, Defendants-Respondents.

Attorney: [8] Martin S. Ettin argued the cause for appellant (Katz, Ettin, Levine, Kurzweil & Weber, attorneys; Andrew S. Genetta and Mr. Ettin, on the brief).

Case Date: May 02, 1996

Court: New Jersey Superior Court