67 S.W. 92 (Tex. 1902), Tenison v. Patton

Citation: 67 S.W. 92, 95 Tex. 284

Opinion Judge: [95 Tex. 289] WILLIAMS, J.

Party Name: TENISON v. PATTON et al.

Attorney: J. C. Muse and McCormick & Spence, for plaintiff in error. [95 Tex. 287] Finley, Etheridge & Knight and Crawford & Crawford, for defendants in error.

Case Date: Monday March 17, 1902

Court: Texas Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

67 S.W. 92 (Tex. 1902), Tenison v. Patton

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 105 U.S. 175 (1882), Marine & River Phosphate Min. & Mfg. Co. v. Bradley
Federal Cases - 127 U.S. 589 (1888), Allen v. Gillette
Federal Cases - 91 U.S. 587 (1876), Twin-lick Oil Co. v. Marbury
Illinois - 77 Ill. 226 (Ill. 1875), Harts v. Brown
Ohio - 34 Ohio St. 450 (Ohio 1878), United States Rolling Stock Co. v. Atlantic & G. W. R. Co.

See all quotations