67 S.E.2d 481 (Ga.App. 1951), 33686, Hester v. Love

Citation: 67 S.E.2d 481, 84 Ga.App. 765

Opinion Judge: TOWNSEND, Judge.

Party Name: HESTER v. LOVE. LOVE v. HESTER.

Attorney: every other respect, presents one substantial issue. Where, as here, the plaintiff alleges that he has retained the commodity purchased for the defendant and sets out a measure of damages pertinent to this state of facts, the defendant may properly deny that the commodity has been so stored for h...

Judge Panel: MacINTYRE, P. J., and GARDNER, J., concur.

Case Date: Thursday October 04, 1951

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

67 S.E.2d 481 (Ga.App. 1951), 33686, Hester v. Love

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 137 S.E. 296 (Ga.App. 1927), 17241, Pierce v. Jones
Georgia - 59 S.E. 331 (Ga.App. 1907), 602, Hicks v. Hamilton
Georgia - 65 S.E. 315 (Ga.App. 1909), 1,268, City of Moultrie v. J.S. Schofield's Sons Co.
Georgia - 48 S.E.2d 156 (Ga.App. 1948), 32025, Cooper v. Brock
Georgia - 61 S.E.2d 423 (Ga.App. 1950), 33184, Love v. Nixon