669 P.2d 154 (Hawai'i 1983), 8587, Bidar v. AMFAC, Inc.

Citation: 669 P.2d 154, 66 Hawai'i 547

Opinion Judge: [10] Nakamura

Party Name: Alta E. BIDAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMFAC, INC., a Hawaii corporation, John Does 1-5, Roe Corporations 1-3, Defendants-Appellees.

Attorney: [7] James Krueger (Virgil James Wilson, III with him on the briefs; Kevin W. Geer with them on opening brief; James Krueger, A Law Corporation, of counsel) for plaintiff-appellant. [8] Roy A. Vitousek, III (David Schulmeister with him on the brief; Cades, Schutte, Fleming & Wright, of counsel) fo...

Case Date: September 16, 1983

Court: Hawaii Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

669 P.2d 154 (Hawai'i 1983), 8587, Bidar v. AMFAC, Inc.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 269 Cal.App.2d 224, 24294, Kriegler v. Eichler Homes, Inc.
Colorado - 439 P.2d 997 (Colo. 1968), 22056, Wells v. Howard
Hawaii - 452 P.2d 445 (Hawai'i 1969), 4679, Pickard v. City and County of Honolulu
Hawaii - 459 P.2d 198 (Hawai'i 1969), 4701, Gibo v. City and County of Honolulu
Hawaii - 462 P.2d 470 (Hawai'i 1969), 4772, Lemle v. Breeden

See all quotations