664 P.2d 661 (Ariz.App. Div. 2 1982), 2 CA-CR 2530, State v. Politte

Citation: 664 P.2d 661, 136 Ariz. 117

Opinion Judge: [11] Birdsall

Party Name: The STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Gary Lindell POLITTE, and Michael Jay Zucker, Appellants.

Attorney: [7] Robert K. Corbin, Atty. Gen. by Bruce M. Ferg, Tucson, for appellee. [8] Thomas G. Kelly, III, Tucson, for appellant Politte. [9] Stolkin & Weiss, P.C. by Stephen M. Weiss and Nat Schaye, Tucson, for appellant Zucker.

Case Date: December 30, 1982

Court: Arizona Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

664 P.2d 661 (Ariz.App. Div. 2 1982), 2 CA-CR 2530, State v. Politte

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

US Code - 18 U.S.C. § 2510 Definitions
US Code - 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Interception and Disclosure of Wire, Oral, Or Electronic Communications Prohibited
US Code - 18 U.S.C. § 2515 Prohibition of Use As Evidence of Intercepted Wire Or Oral Communications
US Code - 18 U.S.C. § 2518 Procedure For Interception of Wire, Oral, Or Electronic Communications
US Code - 18 U.S.C. § 2520 Recovery of Civil Damages Authorized

See all quotations