663 P.2d 1244 (Or. 1983), SC 29194, Amalgamated Transit Union, Local Div. 757 v. Lane County Mass Transit Dist.

Citation: 663 P.2d 1244, 295 Or. 117

Opinion Judge: PER CURIAM

Party Name: AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, LOCAL DIVISION 757, Respondent, v. LANE COUNTY MASS TRANSIT DISTRICT, Appellant.

Attorney: Joseph S. Kaufman, Baltimore, Maryland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were D. Christopher Ohly, and Melnicove, Kaufman, Weiner & Smouse, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, and Bryson & Bryson, Eugene, Oregon. Kalman D. Resnick, Chicago, Illinois, argued the cause for respondent. W...

Case Date: June 01, 1983

Court: Oregon Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

663 P.2d 1244 (Or. 1983), SC 29194, Amalgamated Transit Union, Local Div. 757 v. Lane County Mass Transit Dist.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Oregon Caselaw - Perry v. Oregon Liquor Commission
Federal Cases - New Left Ed. Proj. v. Board of Reg. of the U. of Tex. Sys., 72-1795.
Federal Cases - Jackson Transit Authority v. Local Division 1285, Amalgamated Transit Union
Oregon Caselaw - Amalgamated Transit Union, Local Div. 757 v. Lane County Mass Transit Dist.
Federal Cases - United States v. Munsingwear