66 S.E.2d 93 (Ga.App. 1951), 33521, Van Gundy v. Wilson

Citation: 66 S.E.2d 93, 84 Ga.App. 429

Party Name: VAN GUNDY et al. v. WILSON et al.

Attorney: (b) Extrinsic evidence of actual malice is admissible for the purpose of destroying the defense of privilege., charge excepted to is without qualification and is inherently erroneous., (b) Extrinsic evidence admissible to show malice for the purpose of destroying the defense of privilege is not a...

Case Date: June 14, 1951

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals