66 S.E.2d 172 (Ga.App. 1951), 33626, Neese v. Milwaukee Mechanics' Ins. Co.

Citation: 66 S.E.2d 172, 84 Ga.App. 473

Party Name: NEESE v. MILWAUKEE MECHANICS' INS. CO. MILWAUKEE MECHANICS' INS. CO. v. NEESE.

Attorney: In an action on a policy of automobile collision insurance, where the petition alleged that the plaintiff had duly notified the defendant's agent and had complied with all the terms of the policy with respect to proofs of loss, but where there was no evidence that the plaintiff had complied with ...

Case Date: Friday July 13, 1951

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

66 S.E.2d 172 (Ga.App. 1951), 33626, Neese v. Milwaukee Mechanics' Ins. Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 116 S.E. 922 (Ga.App. 1923), 13522, New Zealand Ins. Co. v. Brewer
Georgia - 158 S.E. 457 (Ga.App. 1931), 20052, Security Ins. Co. v. Jackson
Georgia - 25 S.E. 392 (Ga. 1896), Fidelity & Cas. Co. v. Gate City Nat. Bank
Georgia - 70 S.E. 157 (Ga.App. 1911), 2,501, McLeod v. Travelers' Ins. Co.
Georgia - 66 S.E.2d 260 (Ga.App. 1951), 33575, Denny v. C. L. Fain Co.