66 Cal.App.4th 1172, D024756, Dale v. Dale

Citation: 66 Cal.App.4th 1172, 78 Cal.Rptr.2d 513

Party Name: Dale v. Dale

Attorney: [6] Mazur & Mazur and Janice R. Mazur for Plaintiff and Appellant. Sharron Voorhees, Alan L. Nobler, Gollub and Golsan, Lorraine C. Gollub, Susan Berke Fogel and Pamela A. Kelley as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant. Meisenheimer and Herron, Matthew V. Heron, Robert M. Steele and ...

Case Date: Friday September 25, 1998

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

66 Cal.App.4th 1172, D024756, Dale v. Dale

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 14 Cal.2d 656, 17263, Williams v. Superior Court
California - 17 Cal.2d 280, 16357, Abelleira v. District Court of Appeal
California - 46 Cal.2d 601, 23808, Langley v. Schumacker
California - 49 Cal.2d 210, 23717, Spellens v. Spellens
California - 54 Cal.2d 33, 25715, McDowell and Craig v. City of Santa Fe Springs

See all quotations