655 F.Supp. 1179 (S.D.N.Y. 1987), 86 Civ. 3474, Procter & Gamble Co. v. Big Apple Indus. Bldgs., Inc.

Citation: 655 F.Supp. 1179

Party Name: The PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY and Riverview Productions, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. BIG APPLE INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS, INC., Arol I. Buntzman, Martin William Halbfinger, Esq., George A. Fuller Company, the Arkhon Corporation, Haines Lundberg Waehler and John Does 1-10, Defendants.

Case Date: March 13, 1987

Court: U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

655 F.Supp. 1179 (S.D.N.Y. 1987), 86 Civ. 3474, Procter & Gamble Co. v. Big Apple Indus. Bldgs., Inc.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 802 F.2d 606 (2nd Cir. 1986), 801, United States v. Teitler
Federal Cases - 808 F.2d 184 (2nd Cir. 1986), 1093, United States v. Ianniello
Federal Cases - 643 F.Supp. 489 (S.D.N.Y. 1986), 85 Civ. 8704, Bear Creek Productions, Inc. v. Saleh
Federal Cases - 804 F.2d 970 (7th Cir. 1986), 85-2675, Morgan v. Bank of Waukegan
US Code - 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Definitions

See all quotations

655 F.Supp. 1179 (S.D.N.Y. 1987), 86 Civ. 3474, Procter &amp; Gamble Co. v. Big Apple Indus. Bldgs., Inc.

655 F.Supp. 1179 (S.D.N.Y. 1987), 86 Civ. 3474, Procter & Gamble Co. v. Big Apple Indus. Bldgs., Inc.