65 Cal.2d 559, 22352, Rosenfield v. Malcolm

Citation: 65 Cal.2d 559, 55 Cal.Rptr. 505, 421 P.2d 697

Opinion Judge: [9] Tobriner

Party Name: Rosenfield v. Malcolm

Attorney: [7] Marshall W. Krause and James R. McCall for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] J. F. Coakley, District Attorney, Richard J. Moore, Assistant District Attorney, and Thomas J. Fennone, Deputy District Attorney, for Defendant and Respondent.

Case Date: January 04, 1967

Court: California Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

65 Cal.2d 559, 22352, Rosenfield v. Malcolm

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 24 Cal.2d 267, 18763, Metcalf v. County of Los Angeles
California - 56 Cal.2d 492, 26373, Flores v. Arroyo
California - 64 Cal.2d 199, 22072, Stanton v. Dumke
California - 65 Cal.2d 499, 21831, Bagley v. Washington Tp. Hospital Dist.
California - 183 Cal.App.2d 82, 6177, Henry George School of Social Science of San Diego v. San Diego Unified School Dist.

See all quotations