644 A.2d 656 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1994), Warner Co. v. Sutton

Citation: 644 A.2d 656, 274 N.J.Super. 464

Opinion Judge: [12] Havey

Party Name: WARNER COMPANY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Barbara SUTTON, as Secretary to the Maurice River Township Planning Board; Maurice River Township Planning Board; Maurice River Township and Maurice River Township Committee, Defendants- Respondents, and New Jersey Conservation Foundation; New Jersey Audubon Society; and Citizens United to Protect the Mauric

Attorney: [7] Edward Lloyd argued the cause for appellants (Rutgers Environmental Law Clinic, attorneys; Mr. Lloyd and Margaret M. Hayden on the brief).

Case Date: June 24, 1994

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

644 A.2d 656 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1994), Warner Co. v. Sutton

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 865 F.2d 46 (3rd Cir. 1988), 88-5613, Mesalic v. Slayton
Federal Cases - 689 F.Supp. 416 (D.N.J. 1988), Civ. A. 87-1857, Mesalic v. Slayton
Federal Cases - 423 U.S. 808 (1975), 75-142, Mathews v. Cintron
Colorado - 604 P.2d 686 (Colo.App. 1979), 78-565, City of Boulder v. Sherrelwood, Inc.
Illinois - 369 N.E.2d 543 (Ill.App. 5 Dist. 1977), 77-188, Martin v. City of Greenville

See all quotations