642 P.2d 624 (Or. 1982), SC 27927, Sandford v. Chevrolet Division of General Motors

Citation: 642 P.2d 624, 292 Or. 590

Opinion Judge: PETERSON, J.,

Party Name: Mildred SANDFORD, Petitioner on review, v. CHEVROLET DIVISION OF GENERAL MOTORS and Friendly Chevrolet Company, acorporation, Uniroyal, Inc., a corporation and The Tire Factory, an Oregoncorporation, Respondents on review.

Attorney: Raymond J. Conboy, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the petition for review was Dan O'Leary, John S. Stone, and Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, Kahn & O'Leary. I. Franklin Hunsaker, Portland, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the respondents' brief we...

Case Date: March 16, 1982

Court: Oregon Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

642 P.2d 624 (Or. 1982), SC 27927, Sandford v. Chevrolet Division of General Motors

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 610 F.2d 149 (3rd Cir. 1979), 78-2224, Murray v. Fairbanks Morse
Federal Cases - 565 F.2d 1129 (9th Cir. 1977), 75-3723, Pan-Alaska Fisheries, Inc. v. Marine Const. & Design Co.
Maine - 300 A.2d 491 (Me. 1973), Wing v. Morse
Minnesota - 262 N.W.2d 377 (Minn. 1977), 47231, Busch v. Busch Const., Inc.
New Hampshire - 395 A.2d 843 (N.H. 1978), 7826, Thibault v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

See all quotations