64 N.E. 433 (Ohio 1902), City of Dayton v. Bauman

Citation: 64 N.E. 433, 66 Ohio St. 379

Opinion Judge: BURKET, J. (after stating the facts)

Party Name: CITY OF DAYTON et al. v. BAUMAN.

Attorney: Edwin P. Matthews, City Sol., Charles J. Hunt, and Albert H. Morrill, Corp. Counsel, for plaintiffs in error. Dwyer & Roehm and Young & Young, for defendant in error.

Judge Panel: SPEAR, DAVIS, and SHAUCK, JJ., concur.

Case Date: June 10, 1902

Court: Ohio Supreme Court