639 A.2d 1044 (Conn.App. 1994), 13001, Santoro v. Santoro

Citation: 639 A.2d 1044, 33 Conn.App. 839

Opinion Judge: PER CURIAM.

Party Name: Ernest SANTORO v. Nellie SANTORO.

Attorney: Charles E. Tiernan III and Mary Beattie Schairer, New Haven, in support of the motion., Vito A. Castignoli, Milford, in opposition to the motion. Charles E. Tiernan III and Mary Beattie Schairer, in support of the motion. Vito A. Castignoli, in opposition to the motion.

Judge Panel: Before DUPONT, C.J., and LAVERY, LANDAU and SCHALLER, JJ.

Case Date: March 29, 1994

Court: Connecticut Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

639 A.2d 1044 (Conn.App. 1994), 13001, Santoro v. Santoro

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 544 A.2d 666 (Conn.App. 1988), 6392, In re Clifton B.
Connecticut - 577 A.2d 1064 (Conn.App. 1990), 7798, State v. Holloway
Connecticut - 587 A.2d 164 (Conn.App. 1991), 8849, Scarsdale Nat. Bank and Trust Co. v. Schmitz
Connecticut - 624 A.2d 379 (Conn.App. 1993), 11225, Mulholland v. Mulholland
Connecticut - 639 A.2d 1046 (Conn.App. 1994), 11451, Calabro v. Calabro