637 S.W.2d 649 (Ky. 1982), South Central Bell Telephone Co. v. Utility Regulatory Com'n

Citation: 637 S.W.2d 649

Opinion Judge: I DID THE OF THE COMMISSION, WHICH IMPOSED A PENALTY FOR ALLEGED POOR SERVICE TO ITS CUSTOMERS IN A RATE APPLICATION CASE, VIOLATE THE PROVISIONS OF KRS CHAPTER 278?

Party Name: SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Movant, v. UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION, and Steven L. Beshear, Attorney General, Respondents.

Attorney: Lively M. Wilson, Bruce F. Clark, John A. Bartlett, Stites, McElwain & Fowler, Louisville, for movant., James D. Brannen, Asst. Atty. Gen., William M. Sawyer, Paul M. Cupp, Staff Attys., Public Service Com'n, Frankfort, for respondents., OPINION OF THE COURT, The primary issue on this appeal is t...

Case Date: August 31, 1982

Court: Supreme Court of Kentucky

Linked as:


Document options

Extract

637 S.W.2d 649 (Ky. 1982), South Central Bell Telephone Co. v. Utility Regulatory Com'n

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites