63 S.E.2d 920 (Ga.App. 1951), 33363, Hale-georgia Minerals Corp. v. Hale

Citation: 63 S.E.2d 920, 83 Ga.App. 561

Opinion Judge: FELTON, Judge.

Party Name: HALE-GEORGIA MINERALS CORP v. HALE.

Attorney: The verdict was not supported by the evidence and the court erred in overruling the general grounds of the motion for a new trial., Ingram & Tull, Cartersville, for plaintiff in error., Jefferson L. Davis, Cartersville, for defendant in error. Ingram & Tull, Cartersville, for plaintiff in error....

Judge Panel: SUTTON, C. J., and WORRILL, J., concur.

Case Date: Friday March 02, 1951

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

63 S.E.2d 920 (Ga.App. 1951), 33363, Hale-georgia Minerals Corp. v. Hale

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 122 S.E. 718 (Ga.App. 1924), 15278, Lindale Co-op. Store v. Ailey
Georgia - 69 S.E. 734 (Ga. 1910), Potts-Thompson Liquor Co. v. Potts
Georgia - 1 S.E.2d 221 (Ga.App. 1939), 27181, Kephart v. Gulf Refining Co.
Georgia - 63 S.E.2d 907 (Ga.App. 1951), 33414, Pethel v. General Finance & Thrift Corp.