63 Cal.App.3d 193, 47787, Van Riessen v. City of Santa Monica

Citation: 63 Cal.App.3d 193, 133 Cal.Rptr. 618

Opinion Judge: [10] Hanson

Party Name: Van Riessen v. City of Santa Monica

Attorney: [7] William T. Hays, Seth J. Kelsey and Hays & Petersen for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] Richard L. Knickerbocker, City Attorney, and Carole Heller Solomon, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: Thursday October 28, 1976

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

63 Cal.App.3d 193, 47787, Van Riessen v. City of Santa Monica

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 21 Cal.2d 83, 5489, Pohle v. Christian
California - 33 Cal.2d 564, 20189, Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.
California - 40 Cal.2d 583, 6280, Martin v. Henderson
California - 43 Cal.2d 190, 18624, Tevis v. City & County of San Francisco
California - 46 Cal.2d 761, 24051, County of San Diego v. Milotz

See all quotations