63 Cal.App.3d 121, 39076, Atiya v. Di Bartolo

Citation: 63 Cal.App.3d 121, 133 Cal.Rptr. 611

Opinion Judge: [11] Christian

Party Name: Atiya v. Di Bartolo

Attorney: [7] Fullerton, Lang, Richert & Patch and Jeff Wall for Lien Claimant and Appellant. [8] Marks, Hawkins, Jacobs & Ladd and Charles F. Hawkins for Plaintiff and Respondent. [9] Nagle, Vale, McDowall & Cotter, Hauerken, St. Clair, Zappettini & Hine and Robert L. Hines for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: October 27, 1976

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

63 Cal.App.3d 121, 39076, Atiya v. Di Bartolo

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 58 Cal. 186, 7,208, Lybecker v. Murray
California - 45 Cal.2d 852, 23778, McClearen v. Superior Court
California - 14 Cal.3d 742, 23162, Roseburg Loggers, Inc. v. U. Plywood-Champion Papers, Inc.
California - 8 Cal.3d 168, 7941, Takehara v. H. C. Muddox Co.
California - 197 Cal.App.2d 666, 13, Rouse v. Palmer

See all quotations