63 Cal.2d 534, 27944, Riverside County v. Palm-Ramon Development Co.

Citation: 63 Cal.2d 534, 47 Cal.Rptr. 377, 407 P.2d 289

Opinion Judge: [10] Burke

Party Name: Riverside County v. Palm-Ramon Development Co.

Attorney: [7] Simon & Simon, Saul Ruskin and Francis H. O'Neill for Defendants and Appellants. [8] Ray T. Sullivan, Jr., County Counsel, and Richard J. Lawrence, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent. [9] Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, Dan Kaufmann, Assistant Attorney General, Edward P. H...

Case Date: Monday November 15, 1965

Court: California Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

63 Cal.2d 534, 27944, Riverside County v. Palm-Ramon Development Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 45 Cal.2d 546, 23564, De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San Diego
California - 45 Cal.2d 575, 6568, Fairfield Gardens v. County of Solano
California - 45 Cal.2d 580, 23494, Victor Valley v. County of San Bernardino
California - 45 Cal.2d 586, 23769, El Toro Dev. Co. v. County of Orange
California - 52 Cal.2d 55, 24968, Texas Co. v. County of Los Angeles

See all quotations