628 A.2d 710 (N.J. 1993), Coffman v. Keene Corp.

Citation: 628 A.2d 710, 133 N.J. 581

Opinion Judge: Handler

Party Name: (CCH) P 13,720, 38 A.L.R.5th 911 George COFFMAN, Plaintiff-Respondent, and Elizabeth Coffman, his wife, Plaintiff, v. KEENE CORPORATION, in itself and as successor to Baldwin-Ehret-Hill, Inc., Defendant-Appellant, and Pittsburgh Corning Corp., in itself and as successor to Unarco; H.K. Porter Co.; Raymark Industries, Inc., successor to Raybestos-Ma

Attorney: Gita F. Rothschild argued the cause for appellant (McCarter & English, attorneys; Andrew T. Berry and Michael A. Tanenbaum, of counsel; John C. Garde, Thomas W. Ladd, and Charles F. Rysavy, on the briefs).

Case Date: July 26, 1993

Court: New Jersey Supreme Court