624 A.2d 1030 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1993), Haynoski v. Haynoski

Citation: 624 A.2d 1030, 264 N.J.Super. 408

Opinion Judge: [10] Keefe

Party Name: Benjamin HAYNOSKI, individually and as a Shareholder on behalf of Jersey Steel Rule Die Company, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Leonard HAYNOSKI, Sr., Leonard Haynoski, Jr. and Catherine Haynoski, individually and Jersey Steel Rule Die Company, a New Jersey Corporation, Defendants-Respondents.

Attorney: [7] Marilyn Van Houten argued the cause for appellant, (Pitney, Hardin, Kipp & Szuch, attorneys, Robert G. Rose, on the brief and Joseph Lunin, on the reply brief).

Case Date: May 20, 1993

Court: New Jersey Superior Court