622 N.E.2d 329 (Ohio 1993), 93-1435, State ex rel. Mirlisena v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Elections

Citation: 622 N.E.2d 329, 67 Ohio St.3d 597

Opinion Judge: Per Curiam.

Party Name: The STATE EX REL. MIRLISENA v. HAMILTON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS.

Attorney: Beckman, Weil, Shepardson & Faller and Peter L. Cassady, Cincinnati, for relator., Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Pros. Atty., Philip L. Zorn, Jr. and James W. Harper, Asst. Pros. Attys., for respondent., Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, Kim K. Burke and Mark G. Kobasuk, Cincinnati, urging denial...

Judge Panel: A. WILLIAM SWEENEY, DOUGLAS and RESNICK, JJ., concur. MOYER, C.J., WRIGHT and FRANCIS E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, Justice, concurring. A. WILLIAM SWEENEY and DOUGLAS, JJ., concur in the foregoing concurring opinion. PFEIFER, Justice, concurring. MOYER, Chief Justice, dissenting...

Case Date: September 14, 1993

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Linked as:


Document options

Extract

622 N.E.2d 329 (Ohio 1993), 93-1435, State ex rel. Mirlisena v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Elections

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites