62 So. 859 (Ala. 1913), Caldwell-Watson Foundry & Machine Co. v. Watson

Citation: 62 So. 859, 183 Ala. 326

Opinion Judge: ANDERSON, J. ANDERSON, J.

Party Name: CALDWELL-WATSON FOUNDRY & MACHINE CO. v. WATSON.

Attorney: (5) If you believe the evidence in this case, the defendant's hydraulic press was not defective within the meaning of the Employer's Liability Act. 231Hk2843 Newest, Safest, and Best Equipment. Tillman, Bradley & Morrow and Charles E. Rice, all of Birmingham, for appellant. Allen & Bell and R.D. ...

Judge Panel: Mayfield, J., dissenting. DOWDELL, C.J., and MAYFIELD and DE GRAFFENRIED, JJ., concur. McCLELLAN, SAYRE, SOMERVILLE, and DE GRAFFENRIED, JJ., concur. MAYFIELD, J., dissents. DOWDELL, C.J., not sitting.

Case Date: Thursday January 23, 1913

Court: Alabama Supreme Court