62 P.2d 82 (Okla. 1936), 25665, Cuneo v. Champlin Refining Co.

Citation: 62 P.2d 82, 178 Okla. 198, 1936 OK 540

Opinion Judge: BUSBY, Justice.

Party Name: CUNEO et al. v. CHAMPLIN REFINING CO. et al.

Attorney: Roger Stephens and Fred L. Hoyt, both of Oklahoma City, for plaintiffs in error. E. E. Blake, of Oklahoma City, for respondent Knoell, Knoell & Ivy. Scarritt & Champlin, of Enid, for respondent Champlin Refining Co. Lee B. Thompson, of Oklahoma City, for respondent Hall & Briscoe, Inc.

Judge Panel: WELCH, J., absent.

Case Date: Tuesday September 29, 1936

Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court