62 N.W. 588 (Wis. 1895), McMillen v. Pratt

Citation: 62 N.W. 588, 89 Wis. 612

Opinion Judge: SILAS U. PINNEY, J.

Party Name: McMILLEN, Respondent, v. PRATT, imp., Appellant

Attorney: For the appellant there was a brief by Bouck & Hilton, attorneys, and a separate brief by Hume, Oellerich & Sweet, counsel, and oral argument by Gabe Bouck and John W. Hume. For the respondent there was a brief by Hooper & Hooper, attorneys, and a separate brief by Charles W. Felker, of counsel, ...

Case Date: Tuesday March 05, 1895

Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court